Advantages of open and distance learning
Open and distance learning offers a number of advantages to both learners and to providers of opportunities for learning. Problems such as distance and time, which are barriers to conventional learning, are overcome in open and distance learning.
Overcoming physical distance
Open and distance learning can overcome problems of physical distance for:
· learners in remote locations who are unable or unwilling to physically attend a campus;
· learners and teachers geographically separated in that teachers in urban settings instruct
learners in rural settings.
Example: See the case study on the University of Guyana, Institute of Distance and Continuing Education, for an example of an institution that is serving a widely scattered and remote population using open and distance learning.
Solving time or scheduling problems
Open and distance learning can solve time or scheduling for:
· client groups unwilling or unable to assemble together frequently;
· learners engaged in full-time or part-time work, both waged and volunteer; and
· family and community commitments.
Example: See the case study for the Southern Africa Extension Unit for a description of a programme for training councillors in local government.
Expanding the limited number of places available
Open and distance learning can expand the limited number of places available for:
· campus-based institutions few in number; and
· stringent entrance requirements.
Example: See the case study for the Open University of Sri Lanka for an example of an institution that is expanding access to university education in a country where the number of places available at conventional universities is very limited.
Accommodating low or dispersed enrolments
Open and distance learning can accommodate:
· low enrolments over a long period of time; and
· low enrolments in one geographic region but additional enrolments elsewhere.
Example: See the case studies for the University of Guyana and the Open Access College in Australia for examples of institutions that are meeting the challenge of dispersed
enrolments. Making best use of the limited number of teachers available,
Open and distance learning can make the best use of the few teachers available when:
· there is a lack of trained teaching personnel relative to demand;
· teachers are geographically concentrated; and
· teachers with certain expertise are in short supply.
Example: See the case study for the Open Access College, Australia.
Dealing with cultural, religious, and political considerations
Open and distance learning can deal with differences, and consequently:
· widens women's opportunities to learn;
· meets the needs of populations affected by violence, war, or displacement; and
· makes learning possible even when group assemblies are proscribed.
Discussion: Use this opportunity for a discussion of the problems your participants are trying to solve.
A systems approach to open and distance learning
A systems approach sets the conditions for proceeding in an orderly way. A systems approach also recognises that all the components of the system are interrelated. A change in one component will bring about changes in the others.
Open and distance learning programmes, units, and institutions use a phased model for problem solving:
analyse ® design ® develop ® implement ® evaluate ® revise
Analysis: a detailed examination of all facets of the problem
· What is the problem to be solved?
· Is the problem an instructional problem or an environmental problem?
· Who has the problem?
· What are the resources available to solve the problem?
· What are the constraints or limitations to be faced?
Output from the analysis phase:
· a clear statement of the problem
· a detailed description of the target population
· identification of the resources and constraints
Design: requires the preparation of a detailed solution
· Who are the target population and other stakeholders?
· What will the solution accomplish?
· How will the participants be different after the course or programme?
· How will the participants achieve the objectives?
· How will the course or programme be developed?
· How will you know your solution is effective?
Output from the design phase:
· a detailed plan that describes how, when, by whom, and at what cost the problem will be solved
Development: must address the following kinds of questions
· What strategies, media, and methods will be used for each objective or task?
· What learning resources will be required?
· Where, when, and how will learners be ensured of feedback as they practise their skills?
· Where, how, and when will evaluation activities be used?
· What will be the consequences of success or failure or both?
· How will the instruction be evaluated and revised?
Output from the development phase:
· a complete course or programme package, including all materials, tools, equipment, and
plans for delivery, learner support, learner evaluation, and course evaluations
Implementation: putting the solution into practice
· Are all necessary resources (human, physical, financial) in place?
· Are data collection mechanisms in place?
· Are problem-solving and recording mechanisms in place?
Output from the implementation phase:
· learner progress and performance records
· data from a variety of sources (for example, records and solutions)
· other evaluation data (for example, interviews, questionnaires)
Evaluation: not an 'add-on' but an integral component
· How well does the system meet the goals initially identified?
· How well does it meet the needs of the learners and other stakeholders?
· Do you have sufficient specific information? How will you obtain it?
· What specific changes can be made to improve the system?
Output from the evaluation phase:
· analyses of records and data
· specific solutions, including time, cost, and other resource estimates
Revision: including a review of all decisions and activities of previous phases
· Were the original analyses complete and correct?
· Have circumstances changed sufficiently to require a major review of the analyses?
· What changes, modifications, or improvements are evident in the evaluation data?
· Are sufficient resources available to complete the recommended changes?
· What action needs to be taken?
Output from the revision phase:
· revised course or programme, including the course materials, learner support and
evaluation plan, and a revised course evaluation plan
Functions of open and distance learning
Regardless of the size of the programme, unit, or institution undertaking development and implementation of an open and distance learning system, the following functions must occur at some level. Valuable considerations in relation to each open and distance learning task are listed following.
Obtaining and managing money and other resources
· grant-sustained, cost recovery (self-financing);
· higher development and start-up costs; and
· human support relatively expensive component.
Developing or acquiring programmes and courses
· considerable development time required for full-scale development and production;
· buying or leasing courses from other open and distance learning providers may be more
effective use of resources; and
· continuum of approaches, from single author to large teams of specialists.
Example: See the case study for the University of Lincolnshire and Humberside for and example of course franchising.
Recruiting and promoting
· analyse and assess the needs of your prospective learner populations;
· make information available at right place and time;
· provide sufficient accurate information about time, cost, effort required;
· provide sufficient accurate information about when, where, and how to get involved; and
· reassure potential learners about legitimacy and credibility.
Physically producing, reproducing, storing, and disseminating materials
· course materials requirements may demand print, audio, video, or computer software;
· dissemination may require post, courier, transport companies, telecommunications,
broadcasts, satellites;
· physical production and reproduction time consuming; and
· specialised equipment and personnel required for storage, handling, packaging, dispatch,
inventory.
Enrolling and registering
· process varies from simple manual lists to complex electronic systems;
· fixed or rolling entrance dates; and
· range of delivery options available.
Delivering programmes and courses
· two-way communication required;
· evaluation and feedback;
· collaboration with other agencies;
· library services; and
· record systems.
Providing learner support
· personal support such as advice or counselling;
· academic support such as tutoring, grading, and examining; and
· face-to-face or mediated support.
Examining, crediting, and granting credentials
· range of credit options available;
· exam taking and credit evaluation requirements; and
· involvement of professional associations and external agencies.
Evaluating and revising processes, procedures, programmes, and courses
· learner performance;
· learner satisfaction;
· meeting goals and objectives; and
· resistance to change.
Training and developing staff
· orientation and adjustment to new technologies and approaches; and
· awareness of advantages and limitations of open and distance learning operations.
Discussion: There are many ways of labelling and describing these functions; the ones provided here are only suggestions. Extend your list with examples from both your own and your participants' experience.
Kinds of open and distance learning
A variety of terms describe the type of educational provision that involves some version of an open learning approach and uses open and distance learning techniques to a greater or lesser extent.
Single mode institution
· set up to offer programmes of study at a distance;
· some face-to-face interaction involved, but often optional;
· teaching and learning process 'mediated' in some way
by print, including correspondence;
by audio, including radio (one-way, two-way), cassettes, telephone, or audio conferences;
by video, including television (one-way, two-way), cassettes, or video conferences; and
by computer, including computer-based training, e-mail, computer conferencing, or World Wide Web;
· characterises many of the world's 'mega-universities', including Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), Universitas Terbuka, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU), and United Kingdom Open University (UKOU).
Example: See the case study for IGNOU included with this kit.
Dual mode institution
· offers two modes:
one using traditional classroom-based methods; and
one using distance methods;
· may also offer the same course in both modes, with common examinations;
· regards the two types of learner as distinct: on-campus and external; and
· may or may not allow 'cross-over' registrations.
Example: See the case studies for the Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University, the University of Nairobi, the University of Botswana, and the University of Zambia for discussions of issues facing dual mode institutions.
Mixed mode institution
· offers learners a wide choice of modes of study independent,
group-based, or some
combination; and face-to-face,mediated, or some combination;
· maximises flexibility of place and pace of study;
· the result of 'convergence' of face-to-face and distance modes; and
· increasingly characterises organisations that were once 'single mode' or 'dual mode'.
Example: The case studies for Deakin University and Murdoch Universities provide examples of institutions that are now 'mixed mode'.