TAD Consortium N
ovember 1999 Information Update 2 ********************************PROFILED ORGANIZATIONS
--- Distance Education and Training Council
ONLINE RESOURCES
--- Using music to enhance learning
--- Instruments to assess WBI.
--- Guidelines and processes for teachers planning, designing
and preparing
online courses for distance education students
--- The Practitioner's Guide to "Designing
Instruction for Web-Based
Distance Learning"
--- Breakthebarriers
--- Spend, spend, spend? Is public spending a good thing for the
Tanzanian
economy?
--- What price children? The added value of children to
rural households in
Zambia
PRINTED AND OTHER RESOURCES
--- SAIDE Resource Centre : Selected Abstracts No.6/1999
***************************
NEWS
INTERNET SHOPPING SEEN TRIPLING IN FOURTH QUARTER
Source: Reuters
Internet shoppers will spend $12.2 billion in the fourth quarter of 1999,
triple the amount for the same period last year, Gartner Group analysts
forecast Tuesday. US spending would account for $8.5 billion of that, the
company said at a forum in Orlando.
That $12.2 billion was part of $31.2 billion worth of online shopping the
group expected for all of 1999, with the annual number ballooning to $380
billion by 2003. "Books, CDs and computer sales are still the drivers, but
apparel is the fastest growing segment," said Brett Azume, vice president
for electronic business at DataQuest, a unit of Gartner Group. "This is not
a niche market, this is not an emerging market, this has become a mainstream
market," Azuma said.
***Back to Contents***----------------------------------------
Swaziland and Mauritania to get on Web
Global One, the international joint venture of Deutsche Telekom, France
Telecom and Sprint, has won contracts to design and implement Internet
systems and services for the governments of Swaziland and Mauritania under
the United Nations Internet Initiative in Africa (UNIIA).
UNIIA promotes economic and social development in sub-Saharan Africa by
developing Internet connectivity and national communications capacity.
Global One has provided networks and connections to Botswana, Ethiopia,
Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Sierre Leone, Togo and Zimbabwe. Source:
Communications Africa, August/September 1999.
Taken from The MEDIA BEAT - October 25 (compiled by the Communication
Initiative http://www.comminit.com)---
Big Jump In Standard Readership - Zimbabwe
The Zimbabwe Standard (Harare) - October 10, 1999 - By Itayi Viriri Harare -
The Standard recorded a massive 101% increase in its readership between 1998
and 1999, making it by far the largest increase in readership to be recorded
by any newspaper in Zimbabwe, a media survey has revealed.
http://www.samara.co.zw/standard/index.cfm?id=579&pubdate=1999%2D10%2D10
***Back to Contents******************************
PROFILED ORGANIZATIONS
(This component of the TAD Consortium Newsletter kindly sponsored by
Times
Media Limited - www.tml.co.za)
-----------
The Distance Education and Training Council (formerly the National Home
Study Council) is a non-profit educational association. The site is
accessible at http://www.detc.org ***Back to Contents******************************
ONLINE RESOURCES
Taken from The TrainingZone LearningWire - Issue 71
Using music to enhance learning
Here's an interesting online article brought to our attention recently which
seeks to demonstrate the value of music as an aid not just in relaxing, but
also in promoting learning and performance. I knew there was a good reason
for keeping a CD playing in my laptop whilst I worked!
http://www.mckergow.com/tuneup/effect.htm
----------------------------------------
I have developed several instruments to assess WBI..one of them that is
online is available at
http://web.syr.edu/~maeltigi/Toolbox98/sumeval2.htm
Manal El-Tigi
ISD Coordinator
Evaluation Specialist
TitusAustin Egypt
***Back to Contents***----------------------------------------
Some colleagues and I have developed guidelines and processes for teachers
planning, designing and preparing online courses for distance education
students. These development projects are based on our experience in
developing distance education courses at Central Queensland University and
other institutions over the past 25 years. While some information applies
specifically to Australian situations, much is generic.
The resources are substantial, equivalent to over 200 pages of print
materials. They can be found under the following titles and URLs.
--- Thinking about developing an educational
package -http://www.ddce.cqu.edu.au/NCODE/ncode1/ --- Technology selection - http://www.ddce.cqu.edu.au/NCODE/ncode2/We would appreciate feedback, comments or suggestions for improvement from
edresourcers.
Please return comments to f.nouwens@cqu.edu.au
----------------------------------------
Here are a couple of online resources you might find helpful.
The Practitioner's Guide to "Designing Instruction for Web-Based Distance
Learning"
http://www.wested.org/tie/dlrn/course/
Breakthebarriers is intended to help remove the obstacles that get in the
way of web based training projects. http://breakthebarriers.com ***Back to Contents***----------------------------------------
Spend, spend, spend? Is public spending a good thing for the Tanzanian
economy? contributor(s): Josaphat Kweka and Oliver Morrisey - University of
Nottingham , DSA Conference 1999 23 August 1999
Does government spending enhance economic growth? The evidence supporting a
significant relationship between the two is mixed. The impact of increased
spending differs from country to country depending on the economic
environment and on a particular government's budget allocation to each
sector. Research has thus tended to split such expenditure into two strands:
productive or investment spending which has a positive effect on economic
growth, and non-productive or consumption spending which has a detrimental
effect on growth. Researchers from the University of Nottingham have
attempted to establish which category should be considered productive and
which non-productive in the case of Tanzania.
http://www.id21.org/static/7bjk1.htm
To receive this piece by email, send a message to the following email
address: getweb@webinfo.ids.ac.ukLeave the SUBJECT field BLANK, and copy the following text into the BODY of
the message:
GET http://www.ids.ac.uk/id21/static/7bjk1.htmlFurther information:
Josaphat Kweka
Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT)
Department of Economics
University of Nottingham
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 951 5151
Fax: +44 (0)115 951 4159
Email: lex8jk@lzn2.lass.nottingham.ac.uk ***Back to Contents***----------------------------------------
What price children? The added value of children to rural households in
Zambia contributor(s): Hazel Barrett and Angela Browne - Coventry University
23 September 1999
The value of children in rural Zambia is increasingly seen in terms of an
economic and social resource with a price tag. Environmental hazards and the
resulting social changes add to poverty and uncertainty. The changes are
forcing families to reconsider their attitudes towards the earning abilities
of their offspring and the contribution they make towards a household's
income. Research from Coventry University focused on the Eastern Province
where women bear an average seven children. The study explored the links
between uncertainty, the increasing value of children, and the effects this
has on human fertility.
http://www.id21.org/static/5bld1.htm
To receive this piece by email, send a message to the following email
address: getweb@webinfo.ids.ac.ukLeave the SUBJECT field BLANK, and copy the following text into the BODY of
the message:
GET http://www.ids.ac.uk/id21/static/5bld1.htmlFurther information: Hazel Barrett or Angela Browne
Geography Subject Group
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
Coventry University
Priory Street
Coventry
CV1 5FB
UK
Tel: +44 (0)2476 888444
Fax: +44 (0)2476 888447
Email: gex037@coventry.ac.uk ***Back to Contents******************************
PRINTED AND OTHER RESOURCES
-----------
SAIDE Resource Centre : Selected Abstracts No.6/1999
---
Collaboration
---
Joint Ventures in Distance Education: Mapping Uncharted Terrain by Andrea J
Lee and Tracy G Marsh. In: American Journal of Distance Education, vol.12,
no.2, 1998 pp54-62.
As greater numbers of universities and colleges enter the distance learning
arena, strategic alliances between academic institutions and private sector
businesses are increasing. Various models of academic/business alliances
that emphasize the strength each partner brings to the collaboration have
been discussed in the literature. This article proposes an alternative to
these bipartite models: a tripartite model in which the academic
institution, the business institution, and the students are equal partners
in the learning process. Using cartography as a metaphor for this model, the
strategic alliance between Marygrove College and Canter and Associates to
provide a comprehensive distance learning master's degree program is
discussed. The article describes the challenges this alliance has faced and
offers prescriptions for continued success and future growth.
---
Distance Education
---
Distance Education is a Strategy: What is the Objective? By Thomas W Smith.
In: American Journal of Distance Education, vol.12, no.2, 1998 pp63-72.
The tools and associated with distance education can be used to meet a
number of social, political, or business goals and their accompanying
educational or training objectives. Strategic planning is a means for
developing and verifying the fit between distance education and its
sponsoring goals. This paper reviews a number of strategic plans and the
goals and objectives normally assigned to distance education. This essay
examines assumptions about adopting distance delivery of education and
training by looking at distance education, not as an objective, but as a
strategy that can potentially serve many educational objectives.
---
Facilitation
---
The Complete Facilitator's Handbook by John Heron. London : Kogan Page,
1999.
The model presented in this book provides a key to successful facilitation.
Originating at the Human Potential Research Project, University of Surrey,
and rooted in the realities of facilitator training, this model has been
continuously developed for over 25 years, and is committed to empowering
whole people in highly flexible learning environments. Analytical and well
structured, it relates six basic learning dimensions to three primary forms
of decision-making, and within this framework offers an extensive repertoire
for practical action. It provides essential support for facilitators to
develop their own style and build effective skills relevant to the diverse
situations they may encounter. As well as practical guidance, there is a
strong theoretical content, covering group dynamics, facilitator authority,
experiential and whole person learning, personal charisma, co-operative
inquiry and social change. The appendix applies the whole model, in detail,
to the manager as facilitator.
---
Higher Education
---
An Audit Perspective, 1995-1998 by David Woodhouse. Wellington : New Zealand
Universities Academic Audit Unit, 1999.
The Academic Audit Unit (AAU) audited the seven universities during the
period 1995-1998, beginning with Victoria University of Wellington, which
submitted its audit portfolio to the AAU in February 1996, and ending with
Lincoln University, whose audit report was published in June 1998. This
overview is based on the seven audit reports and is therefore a historical
document. It presents a snapshot of aspects of the university sector in the
period 1995 to 1998. Even within this period, it is more of a video than a
still, because the universities have been changing constantly: in
anticipation of audit, in response to audit, in response to the changing
environment, and through continuing initiatives. Despite its historical
character, this overview should be of value, as it deals with issues that
frequently recur in different ways and different guises.
---
Outcomes Based Education
---
Changing Curriculum: Studies on Outcomes Based Education in South Africa ed.
By Jonathan Jansen and Pam Christie. Cape Town : Juta, 1999.
The introduction of outcomes based education (OBE) is the most controversial
reform in the history of South African education. It goes right to the heart
of the ongoing process of transforming this country into a democracy and
shedding the legacy of apartheid. The book is a critical analysis of
outcomes based education, its potential to succeed and its inherent
implications for the education system. It fills that vital space lying
between the conception of the system and its implementation. Changing
Curriculum : provides critical and wide-ranging analyses of outcomes based
education; combines theoretical work and field research; contextualises the
South African debate in terms of broader intellectual movements in
education; includes input by teachers, lecturers, government officials,
curriculum theorists and policymakers; constructs a much-needed dialogue
between various players in the educational field.
---
Evaluation of Curriculum 2005 and Outcomes Based Education in Gauteng
Province submitted by Khulisa Management Services with MBM Change Agents to
The Gauteng Institute for Curriculum Development. Johannesburg : GICD, 1999.
This evaluation of Curriculum 2005 and Outcomes Based Education in Gauteng
Province was conducted by Khulisa Management Services on behalf of the
Gauteng Institute for Curriculum Development. The evaluation was designed to
answer six research questions: What has been the experience in implementing
OBE-Curriculum 2005 in Grade 1 during 1998 (with special examination of
learner assessment practices and the availability/use of learner materials)?
How adequate was the preparation in 1997 for Grade 1 implementation during
1998? How adequate is the 1998 preparation of Grade 2 (for implementing
C2005 in 1999)?What has been the process for introducing and promulgating
OBE and Curriculum 2005 at provincial, district, and school levels. How
successful has this process been? What do Gauteng education professionals
(administrators, educators, policy makers, etc) think about the concept of
Curriculum 2005? How has OBE-Curriculum 2005 impacted on learner
performance.
---
Student Progress
---
Unravelling the complexities of distance education student attrition by
Christopher K Morgan and Maureen Tam. In: Distance Education: An
International Journal vol.20, no.1 1999 pp96-108.
This paper reports on an investigation into the complexities of student
attrition in a distance education course. Deep-seated factors involved in
the attrition process are disclosed as the particular qualitative research
process that was employed mapped student responses through the course of
interviews. These tabulations reveal interesting patterns of change as
students volunteer explanations for their decisions.
---
Technology Enhanced Learning
---
External Quality Assurance for the Virtual Institution by Shona Butterfield
et al. Wellington : NZUAAU, 1999.
In order to investigate the establishment, use and auditing of QA systems
for virtual institutions, one may begin by asking, What are the essential
differences between a conventional and a virtual institution, especially in
relation to QA? The authors argue that the difference is significant, and
that the difference must be reflected in the QA processes. However, it is
further argued that few institutions will fit neatly into one category, as
providing either face-to-face or on-line or distance education. A single
institution, and even a single course may evince characteristics of all
these modes. The area of interest of this publication may therefore be
described in a more general formulation as "flexible learning and teaching".
This definition includes: the provision of teaching programmes on the
internet; the use of media such as broadcasting, teleconferencing and
CD-ROM; all the systems currently used to provide educational programmes to
distance students; systems for the collaboration between campuses or
institutions for teaching; and the transformation of campus-based study by
the increasing use of information technology. There are basic processes for
QA and questions for academic audit that are sufficiently generic to be
applied to all institutions and modes, while others are more specific to the
mode. The central question is how does a higher education institution ensure
quality and how does an external quality agency verify this?
---
Leadership in Accreditation and Networked Learning by James W. Hall. In: The
American Journal of Distance Education, vol.12, no.2, 1998 pp 5-15.
Distance Education and traditional campus-based education are experiencing a
historic convergence that has produced a high degree of anticipation and
anxiety among those who deal with institutional evaluation and
accreditation. Convergence of these two approaches as networked education is
well-advanced; today's instruction, once mediated at the boundaries of the
campus both by the state authority and the regional or professional
accreditation body, easily crosses physical boundaries and established
jurisdictions. Accreditation threatens to become a pastich of intertwining
jurisdictions, since neither government nor accreditors have fully
anticipated the implications of networked education. How will public policy
ensure that appropriate educational and academic controls persist, and how
and by whom will the decisions that guarantee the quality, continuity and
credibility of student work be made? Students themselves may already be
providing new directions for leadership.
---
Learning to solve problems on the Web: Aggregate Planning in Business
Management Course by David Jonassen and others. In: Distance Education: An
International journal vol.20, no.1, 1999 pp49-63.
In this paper, we articulate a model for designing learning environments
that engage learners in solving problems and can be delivered to learners at
a distance via the World Wide Web. These environments include a problem
(including representation, context, and manipulation spaces), related cases,
information resources, cognitive tools, and collaborative support. We apply
this model to an environment on aggregate planning in an operations
management course. Students represent the problem, collect resources and
experiences, and solve the problem using a spreadsheet, which can be machine
scored. Field trials showed that students were challenged, and they liked
being able to see the results of their manipulations instantly.
***Back to Contents******************************
ARTICLES
-----------
Information technology and higher education: The "global academic village"
and intellectual standardization-- Written by Phil Agre, June 1998
University administrators these days are planning for a world in which
information technology is pervasive -- so pervasive, in fact, that the very
institution of higher education begins to change. It is entirely possible,
of course, that we can use information technology to improve higher
education. But information technology is exceedingly flexible, and we will
surely face numerous choices about how best to apply it. Some of those
choices will be ethically straightforward matters of efficiency, best left
to the experts. Other choices, however, will require us to reflect carefully
on the values that a university ought to express. If we have learned
anything from attempts to improve life using information technology, it is
that significant improvements are only possible when institutions are
rethought at a basic level. Some will argue that the necessary changes are
inevitable, having been determined in advance by the technology. But such
arguments should be examined with great care: in practice they will usually
be found to encode important ethical stances that do admit reasonable
alternatives.
Let us take an example. A recent letter to University of California faculty
from the chair of the University's Academic Council, Sandra Weiss, discussed
something called "course articulation", which she defines as "the degree to
which students can build an additive degree program by taking courses either
at different institutions or at the different campuses of one institution".
This same idea is called "modularity" in Britain, where it was central to
the higher education platform of the Thatcher and Major governments. On the
motives behind course articulation, Professor Weiss explains that "we have
moved into an era where individual campuses are becoming part of a larger
academic community -- a "global academic village" so to speak". Information
technology helps drive this trend, and Professor Weiss further explains that
"[f]or technology-mediated coursework, we need to identify comparable
content across courses that would be acceptable for transfer and also
grapple with our expectations regarding traditional "face to face contact"
between professor and student and among students themselves". (Quotes are
from Professor Weiss's "Notes from the Chair" column in the May 1998 issue
of the "Notices" of the University of California's Academic Senate.)
This sort of discussion refutes often-heard stereotypes of professors -- or
"academic elites", as the new jargon would have it - as Luddites engaged in
bull-headed resistance to technologically driven institutional change. Quite
the contrary, as Professor Weiss's letter illustrates, my own impression is
that fundamental changes are being implemented as we speak, and that these
changes are often taking place beneath the radar screens of most faculty,
much less the broad public. Now, the University of California has perhaps
the most robust traditions of shared governance of any public university in
the world, and so the faculty here have no excuse if they are unaware that
these things are going on. And although I have my differences with the
University of California administration, I think the game is being played
more or less fairly. Still, it is important that we step back and ask what
we are getting ourselves into, and what choices we are actually making.
I believe that traditional practices of computer system design lead to an
important phenomenon that I call "ontological standardization". When you
write a computer program, almost the first step is to define the ontology
that the program's data structures are going to reflect -- that is, what
sorts of things you think the world is made out of, and therefore what sorts
of data objects are going to be created and stored through the program's
operation. The technical term for this is a "data model". In the case of
higher education, one's ontology might include people, job titles,
departments, courses, majors, and grades. The ontology, in other words, has
(at least) those six components, and your program will only work right if
everything the program needs to represent can be comfortably subsumed within
one or more of those six categories.
In the old, unnetworked world, different organizations - universities in
this case -- all developed their ontologies somewhat independently of one
another. Forces did exist toward what Walter Powell and Paul Dimaggio call
"institutional isomorphism" -- for example, the frequent movement of
administrators from one organization to another. In the world of networked
computing, however, the forces for institutional isomorphism are greatly
amplified. If each student makes only a single choice among hundreds of
different four-year schools, it does not matter so much whether the internal
workings of those schools can be mapped onto one another. But if we suddenly
move to the opposite extreme by letting each student choose among those
hundreds of schools for each course or even each class meeting, then
suddenly the schools need to ensure that they mean the same thing by the
very concept of a course or a class meeting. Thus far, this issue has arisen
primarily in the context of mergers between corporations: if the two
companies' computers don't talk to one another, say because each side has
meant something different by a word like "employee" or "sales", then genuine
havoc can result. Now, however, the same issue can arise in a wide variety
of institutional contexts, even when separate organizations are not being
formally merged. Ontological standardization, then, is what happens when
most of the organizations in a given institutional field are required to
harmonize what they mean by the most fundamental categories of their
internal workings.
What are the practical consequences of this force? The trend toward course
articulation is a good example. In the old days -- that is to say, the past
up to and including right now -- universities competed on the basis of their
distinctive programs: one university's economics department, for example,
might be ranked above another university's economics department in some
magazine survey. In such a world, each university is able to take its own
distinctive approach, and then each program within a university is able to
take *its* own distinctive approach within the overall context of the
university. The University of Chicago emphasizes scholarship, for example,
and Harvard emphasizes social networking. Each program is able to divide up
its curriculum into courses however it likes in accordance with its own
distinctive approach. And because decisions about program philosophy and
course content are made locally by each faculty, on the basis of its own
talents and its competition to attract the best students, the contents of
courses and the boundaries between courses can change rapidly and flexibly
to suit the evolving circumstances.
With ontological standardization, however, all of this threatens to change.
It is, to be sure, a good thing to help students transfer between campuses:
the possibility of transferring from a community college into the University
of California system, for example, has been a basic part of California's
higher education strategy for decades, even if the transfer students don't
always have the easiest time of it. We need to recognize, however, that the
ease of transferring courses between schools -- effectively assembling one's
college education a la carte from among the offerings of a large number of
potentially quite different programs -- may come at a significant price in
intellectual diversity. If the internal modularity of degree programs must
be coordinated centrally, or at least negotiated among numerous independent
universities, then the result will be less flexibility and greater
uniformity. Power over fine details of the curriculum will inevitably shift
in the direction of accrediting organizations, university administrators,
and other professional coordinators. Faculty may effectively lose the
ability to write their own syllabi. The diversity of thinking and teaching
at universities has long been important to the health of a free society.
That is, for example, why professors get tenure once they have proven their
abilities by passing through many levels of competition and testing. And it
may be tempting to stereotype universities as having become dominated by one
or another unpopular tendency as a pretext for standing by as the
institution drifts into greater uniformity. But I think that would be a
terrible mistake. We need to preserve the institutional conditions for a
diversity of intellectual approaches.
As we decide how to use information technology in higher education, we face
choices that follow a pattern. In the "old days", various important
values -- in this case decentralization and diversity -- were guaranteed, or
at least encouraged, by the limitations of the physical world. Universities
were numerous and spread out, it was relatively difficult to transfer people
and practices between them, and so different universities evolved along
somewhat independent paths. Now, however, we only get that independence,
that separate evolution and diversity of educational approach, if we
actively choose it. We will make some of our choices out in the open. But we
will make other choices implicitly, tacitly, as a seeming consequence of
simply following through the logic that information technology imposes on
us.
We have been disserved, I think, by "cyber" claims that information
technology inherently and inevitably brings decentralization and diversity
to the world. If my own argument has the slightest merit then this is not
so, and indeed the opposite might be closer to the truth. I do not believe
that technology has any essential and inevitable consequences, however. The
traditional practices of computer system design first arose in military and
industrial settings in which centralized coordination is a virtue, or at
least in which centralization does not threaten important societal values.
In higher education, however, it is a different story. Let us use technology
when it helps us do our good work better. But let us not permit the
technology and its customary practices to dictate important, value-laden
changes in our institutions. And when the situation calls for it, let us
develop new technology, or else wait until somebody develops it for us. The
whole point of technology is to serve human purposes, but the burden of
technology is that we must choose what those purposes are.
----------------------------------------
Telecenters are increasingly being supported by donors as a means for
expanding access to information and knowledge, and for helping those in
developing countries to gain access to economic and educational
opportunities via the Web. In designing and implementing telecenters, it
seems helpful to consider the experience of telecenters in the US and other
industrialized countries.
The Community Technology Centers' Network (CTCNet), is part of Education
Development Center, an NGO that conducts projects around the world. CTCNet
has established hundreds of telecenters in rural and urban low-income areas
of the US. They typically (although not exclusively) serve underserved
and/or economically disadvantages groups. Recently, CTCNet conducted an
evaluation of those telecenters' experience, and the results, I believe, are
relevant to telecenters in developing countries. The evaluation was based on
817 surveys from 44 centers in D.C. and 14 states. Below I've summarized
some of the major findings of the evaluation.
The telecenters provide valuable services to women and girls, people widely
ranging in age, members of racial or ethnic minorities, and populations with
relatively few financial resources
* The majority (62%) of the respondents were women or girls.
* Respondents ranged in age from 13 to 91. Half were between the ages of 20
and 49. 11% were 60 or older.
* 2/3 identified themselves as "nonwhite"
* Approximately 75% of users said their household incomes were considerably
lower than the 1996 median US household income
* Aside from students, 38% were unemployed; 27% were part-time or temporary
workers
2. Clients used telecenters for a wide range of services
* 76% took classes at the center and also used the computers for
self-directed activities. Many acquired or improved English language skills,
got tutoring, or participated in adult education programs. They also used
the computers to obtain information from the Internet, use email, and set up
Websites.
* 68% came to the telecenter specifically to carry out their own activities,
e.g., writing a newsletter
3. An important benefit of the telecenter was its use to develop job skills
and learn of income-generating opportunities
* 65% of respondents took classes to improve their job skills
* 30% used the Internet to search for a job
* Of the 446 job seekers, 14% had obtained a job and 67% were closer to
obtaining one. Only 19% said they were no closer.
* Of the 586 people who used the telecenters to improve job skills, 8%
reached their goal. 82% said the telecenter had helped them move closer to
achieving their goals. Only 10% said they were no closer.
4. The telecenters had a positive impact on clients' educational goals
* 85% felt much more positive or somewhat more positive about themselves as
learners due to their participation in telecenter classes and other
activities.
5. The telecenters supported community building
* 71% said that email was important to them, to maintain or extend community
networks
* More than half of the centers' users said the telecenter was an important
source of information about local events and government information
* 82% of respondents said that the "supportive atmosphere" was a fairly or
very important reason for visiting the telecenter
6. Overall perceptions of the telecenters were overwhelmingly positive.
* 94% said they had positive feelings about the telecenter that they visited
* Only 6% had mixed or negative feelings
***Back to Contents******************************
Telematics for African Development Consortium
P.O. Box 31822
Braamfontein
2017
Johannesburg
South Africa
Tel: +27 +11 403-2813
Fax: +27 +11 403-2814
* To view an archive of previous updates visit:
www.saide.org.za/tad/archive.htm
* For resources on distance education and
technology use in Southern Africa visit:
www.saide.org.za/worldbank/Default.htm
***************************
***Back to Contents***
For Browsers that don't support frames:
BACK to TAD archive index